 |
|
#8:
The Truth Hurts
Michael Joshua Rowin on The Squid and the
Whale
I pity filmmakers—and
likewise novelists, songwriters, and painters—who
directly channel their personal histories
into art. First you have to delve into the
swampy regions of the past and dredge up
emotionally painful experiences. Then, once
the project is at last complete, you must
deliver it to audiences and film critics
who will undoubtedly focus on the connections
between your fiction and your reality rather
than the thematic points you intended to
make. Especially if the characters are thinly
veiled representations of family members
and loved ones. And especially if any of
those people have spent considerable time
in the public eye.
Fortunately, Noah Baumbach’s The Squid and the Whale found the critical—if not box-office—attention it rightly deserved in 2005, even with its singular, upscale milieu and superficially juicy divorce details of the director’s well-known parents providing potential diversions. Squid’s more important qualities are rare these days—while the past year’s other best films were in large part ambitious political allegories (Caché, Land of Plenty, The World) or elliptical, oneiric challenges to conventional narrative cinema (Innocence, The Intruder, Café Lumiere), The Squid and the Whale stood out as one of the few successful character-driven dramas, in other words, one driven by actual, multidimensional characters. Avoiding the trap of using them as straw men or punching bags for harbored grievances, Baumbach clearly sketches the lines connecting members of his fictional Berkman family through their disorienting, universal feelings of need, respect, attention, envy, and love. That Baumbach does so without condescension or indulgence, and with a terrific sense of humor, is nearly revelatory.
Those revelations are embodied in perfectly captured moments of confusion and awkwardness. Dialogue is Baumbach’s forte, and there’s an economic and tonal quality to the language of fumbling interactions. The scenes that most spoke to me were the ones where paterfamilias Bernard, after breaking up with his now more successful writer wife, tries to vicariously experience the halcyon days of young bachelorhood he never had by insidiously advising son Walt to play the field, even though the teenager already has a lovely girlfriend and is just starting to experience the fragile process of cultivating a romantic relationship. This male bonding ritual—talking about women—is so sadly moving here because the ideal of a mature dialogue between father and son becomes dramatically offset by the unhealthy nature of their relationship, in which the latter, out of hero worship and devotion, naively imitates the former. “She’s not the type I go for,” Bernard authoritatively—and inappropriately—states. Bernard is trying to act hip (he’s had Walt staunchly on his side even before the divorce, but clearly needs an even stronger ally), but he only ends up warping Walt by passing on his own ineffectual masculine pride and further aggravating Walt’s need for peer and parental approval. That Bernard satisfies his midlife crisis and strikes back at philandering wife Joanne by sleeping with Lili, the provocative college student who stays at his house and who also has a crush on Walt, doesn’t exactly simplify matters. A film like The Squid and the Whale lives and dies with its actors—the entire Beckman clan is played perfectly by its cast, but none more so than Jeff Daniels, who’s been rightly hailed for his interpretation of Bernard, all slouched resignation and passive-aggressive intellectualism, an emotional cripple hiding behind literary references and pompous judgments. He remarkably shapes Baumbach’s scenarios by displaying a lifetime of delusions and defenses in a single hurt look. While Daniels’ performance and Bernard’s central role in the film push Laura Linney’s Joan to the sidelines (one of the film’s few flaws), Baumbach has done something special by tackling the restrictive codes of father-son alliances.
|
 |
|
Then there’s
Walt—the other half of the above-mentioned
equation—and his solo acoustic performance
of Pink Floyd’s “Hey You.” Not since Rebekah
del Rio’s Spanish a cappella rendering of
Roy Orbison’s “Crying” in Mulholland
Drive have I been so struck by a musical
performance and its thematic resonances
within a film. The song is Walt’s plea for
connection, of course, but it also builds
on his penchant for mimicry—perhaps better
written in this context as “mimic-cry.”
Films like The Squid and the Whale
can be judged in part by how scenes of adolescence’s
plaintive embarrassments (not out-and-out
humiliations, which many such dramas primarily
traffic in) and concealed crimes are brought
to life and holistically enacted. Baumbach’s
film plays out as a series of private trials
made disarmingly public, and “Hey You” is
the freeze-frame moment of youthful yearning
and boneheaded decision, of inarticulate
frustrations finding release in fits of
emotional nakedness and cultural appropriation.
While Walt finds a slightly better outlet
than his brother Frank—who at 12 is already
drinking, cursing, and masturbating with
id-like abandon—his rough maturation is
as difficult to watch as your own memories
of being Walt’s age, when only a nascent
understanding of oneself is attainable.
In The Squid and the Whale that difficulty
stems from a sense of actually accompanying
these people as they live life without the
safety net of tidy resolution or redemptive
edification. Walt’s confused reaction to
his parents’ divorce is only a personal
manifestation of the missing common ground
that remains buried under the Beckman clan’s
complexes—they struggle against their own
instincts and needs and, as in reality (but
so rarely at the movies), they more often
lose than win. It’s nice to see Walt gain
insight at the end of the film as he begins
to awaken from his Bernard-induced stupor,
but there’s clearly still work to be done.
The film’s blatant title metaphor (the squid
and whale diorama at the Museum of Natural
History always haunted me as a kid as well—maybe
Baumbach tapped into something there, too)
makes this plain—there’s no real victor
between these aquatic enemies, no winner
or loser in the Beckman divorce, no winners
or losers in life. There’s just the scarring
battle, and as small and seemingly insulated
as that battle is in Baumbach’s film—and
as small and seemingly insulated as it might
have seemed in a year of bold cinematic
statements—it really means the world.
|