  |
|
Nouveau
Pauvre
by Leo Goldsmith
Fun with Dick and Jane
Dir. Dean Parisot, U.S.A., Columbia-Tristar
About halfway
through Fun with Dick and Jane, the
attentive viewer might start to notice a
preponderance of small signs that read,
“Gore-Lieberman 2000.” It’s an odd gesture,
one that registers neither as a cogent declaration
of political alliance, nor as a pointed
“I told you so.” And when George Bush appears
onscreen, delivering his 1999 stump speech
about the “purpose of prosperity” to cable
news audiences, the viewer is given another
chance to head-scratch. Is this nostalgia
for a pre-9/11 world and a boyish, wide-eyed
presidential hopeful? A liberal finger wagging
at America’s former (or current) naïveté?
Or has Judd Apatow’s script just been sitting
around for five years?
As a work of recent history, Fun with
Dick and Jane toes a rocky path, particularly
for a comedy (and a Jim Carrey movie at
that). In the movies, the smart money is
on the historical epic, where the remote
past can be mythologized beyond recognition.
Revisiting the recent past, as Fahrenheit
9/11 and The Big Lebowski make
plain, is usually an awkward reminder of
foibles we haven’t fully outgrown. And so,
when we meet Dick and Jane Harper in the
salad days of 2000, the only noticeable
difference (aside from Carrey’s spiky Matt
Lauer haircut and his shiny, three-button,
Regis Philbin suits) is the sunny optimism
of Bush’s “age of unmeasured prosperity.”
Living somewhere in Anywhere, USA (Los Angeles,
it turns out), the Harpers are the kind
of happy, modern couple who cede parental
duties to a Mexican nanny named Blanca and
schedule sexual intercourse around the availability
of the new Starbucks sampler CD (featuring
Sadé). Their grey, prefabricated house sits
among the identical houses of their neighbors,
each boasting copious bathrooms and a BMW
in the driveway. The bubble is intact, and
all is right with the world of the upper
middle class.
On an oh-so-typical morning, Dick cheerily
commutes to his nebulous job at Globodyne,
a faceless (and seemingly purposeless) corporation,
where he glad-hands clients and makes incomprehensible
MBA-speak with his colleagues. For his good
services, Dick is wooed by “Corporate” to
become Vice President of Communications
(or something), and to publicly announce
the company’s quarterly earnings on national
television. Wasting no time, Dick coaxes
Jane into ditching her job as a travel agent
and promptly calls the contractors to have
a pool installed. Flashing his plastic,
toothy grin, Dick soon turns up on a cable
news channel to represent his beloved corporation
and is summarily grilled into submission
by an ersatz Lou Dobbs and an all-too-real
Ralph Nader (in a decidedly unflattering
cameo). It seems that Globodyne’s execs
have been ImCloning around, and have neglected
to inform Dick before airtime (or before
golden-parachuting themselves out of the
mess). Consequently, the corporation’s stock
tanks, its employees are left jobless, and,
suffering the worst indignity of our age,
Dick becomes the subject of an amusing email
forward.
In updating Ted Kotcheff’s 1977 film of
the same name, Judd Apatow and Nicholas
Stoller have lifted whole sequences for
the body of their film. But with a dash
of contrived relevance, the writers have
inserted a little updated material into
the setup, even venturing to thank the executives
of Tyco, WorldCom, and Enron by name in
the end credits, just in case you missed
the point. As Globodyne fat cat Jack MacCallister,
a portly, improbably Southern Alec Baldwin
tries for his best Ken Lay-George Bush impersonation,
giving interviews while hunting grouse and
telling reporters, “Now, watch this shot!”
Whatever its “point” may be, the film finds
mercenary motives at the very heart of the
American Dream, and it is not long before
our Dick, worn down by all-you-can-eat buffets
and bathing in the neighbor’s sprinkler,
decides to do a little stealing for himself.
Despite the pseudo-currency at its outset,
the rest of the film cleaves closely to
the original, a forgettable film even by
Jane Fonda standards. Here, as in the earlier
version, most of the laughs trade in the
sort of bland racial and class stereotypes
that favor no one in particular—and are
therefore available for all of us to enjoy.
Like George Segal’s Dick, Carrey’s character
endures the humiliations of job-hunting
with minorities, is mistaken for an illegal
Mexican immigrant by the I.N.S., and makes
a couple of one-liners about prostitution
before resigning himself to a life of crime.
“We followed the rules and we got screwed,”
Dick tells his wife, resolving to stick
it to The Man by stealing his way back to
shallow bourgeois respectability. With their
son’s water pistol handy, Dick and Jane
graduate from shoplifting Slushees, to knocking
over head-shops, to ordering their skim-milk
mocchacinos at gunpoint. Before long, the
Harpers’ pool is finished, they can pay
their landscapers again, and Dick is the
envy of every man on his block. But with
the clockwork inevitability, the third act
finds a repentant (or compassionate conservative)
Dick and Jane seeing the error of their
ways and resolving to “leave no one behind.”
While the film’s stabs at satire remain
ultimately toothless and its comedy shamelessly
treads that currently chic line of
sarcastic racism, the film nonetheless moves
briskly enough and has a few inspired touches.
For one thing, it’s at least a treat to
see an American comedy that doesn’t seem
to have been assembled during a drunken
weekend and that doesn’t feature a Wilson
brother. Director Dean Parisot has proved
himself adept at this kind of slick, painless
comedy. His 1999 film Galaxy Quest
made much of a potentially slight premise,
and if Fun with Dick and Jane does
not succeed nearly as well, it is largely
because it squanders a fine roster of character
actors. Laurie Metcalf, John Michael Higgins,
Jeff Garlin, Kym Whitley, and even Baldwin
(now officially a character actor) appear
in woefully slight roles (while Téa Leoni,
as Dick’s paramour, is in every other scene
yet remains barely noticeable). The only
supporting player to get much camera time
is Richard Jenkins, whose appearance as
a drunken, crooked stuffed-shirt is a nice
variation on the actor’s performances for
the Coen Brothers.
This means most of Fun with Dick and
Jane revolves around the film’s star
(oh yes, and producer), Jim Carrey, who
here seems relatively underamphetamined,
if even a bit haggard. Carrey is starting
to show the wear of his 43 years, but he’s
still sprightly enough, and for the most
part, the film is as surprisingly agile
as he is: trim and fast-paced, stumbling
only in those perfunctory moments of moral
clarity (there’s more to life than WASP
culture!), in which the requisite cheerful
conclusions (and flavorsome comeuppances)
are to be doled out. But here too, the film
is mercifully streamlined, without letting
Carrey mug or emote for any duration. This
is to say that one’s enjoyment of the film
turns primarily on Carrey’s performance
not merely because the actor is an unabashed
comedic ham but also because the film’s
pathos for its characters hinges upon Carrey’s
status as the prototypical “Dick.” Carrey,
the film proposes, is an Everyman for the
21st century. But if, like me, you don’t
happen to sympathize with any of the film’s
variations on the American Dream, that’s
a frightening thought. |