 |
|
Gag a Maggot
Leah Churner on High Spirits
Neil
Jordan deserves the silent treatment for
High Spirits; that any ink should
be spilled over this fetid log is a tragedy.
Bracing himself for a much-deserved slap
in the face, knave Jordan offered excuses
and denied culpability, but really he should’ve
sent flowers. If you love this director,
or are simply a masochist, you may overlook
the suspicious details of his apologetic
folk story and allow him to move from the
doghouse to the couch. He contends he was
locked out of the editing room (literally)
after the studio saw his esoteric original
version, in which the mood was more serious,
the humor darker, and the character-development
extant. This heady art film, High Spirits:
The Director’s Cut allegedly saw limited
video release in Japan (convenient!) before
Jordan, man of mystery, absconded with the
original print and locked it away in a vault.
Yes, a vault, darling.
Even if “vault” is, as I suspect, an Irish
colloquialism for “dumpster,” Jordan should
have recognized High Spirits as a
train wreck long before he was booted from
the editing process. After all he wrote
it, shitty premise and all. The tagline
is a stroke of genius in its terse conveyance
of the magnitude of dreadful mawkishness
and tireless illogic that pervades every
frame: “She’s a ghost. He’s an American.
Vacation romances are always a hassle.”
It seems Jordan was then existing on a separate
plane, where it is perfectly reasonable
to blindly take all the contents in his
cupboards and fridge, throw them into Cuisinart,
and declare dinner served. The concoction
may not be ambitious, but it’s busy. Perhaps
it has some of your favorite ingredients
in it, but they are no longer distinguishable
from the overall brownish, smelly goop.
It’s a love story, a slapstick sex comedy,
a family film, a horror movie, and a conscientious
romp about Anglo-American relations. It’s
also a rumination on the conditions of the
afterlife, and a detailed manual specifying
innumerable convoluted guidelines about
how to have a physical relationships with
the deceased.
|
| |
|
At first,
High Spirits also tries to assert
itself as a romantic-comedy remake of House
on Haunted Hill (1959). Jordan borrows
the bare bones of its structure: a group
of motley strangers arrive at a creepy mansion,
in hopes of surviving a stay in a haunted
spot. The master of the house, a charismatically
decadent dandy, insists the place is teeming
with ghosties, while the visitors maintain
that they don’t believe in spooks.
In both films, the host is by far the most
compelling of the characters. Peter O’Toole
is Peter Plunkett, flamboyantly fatalistic
lush whose character only flourishes in
the first five minutes. This glimmer of
promise in High Spirits is promptly
drowned in a silly sea of bagpipes and predictability.
O’Toole isn’t great as a postmodern analog
for Vincent Price’s Frederick Loren, (he’s
no Dr. Frank-N-Furter), but he is outstanding
in relation to the rest of the cast.
Like Haunted Hill, High Spirits
opens with menacing exterior shots of the
house and introduces the gaggle of guests
as they are chauffeured there. This time,
the setting is an Irish castle rather than
a Frank Lloyd Wright California mansion,
and instead of individual hearses, the guests
come in a ramshackle bus, which is supposed
to propel the comedic narrative along with
its bumpy ride. But it sinks in every sense,
and the guests arrive at Castle Plunkett
sopping wet.
The characters in Haunted Hill comprise
a fascinating array of Fifties-era fringe
types: a young test pilot who remains a
bachelor, a cowardly alcoholic, a shady
psychiatrist, a city-dwelling sophisticate
with a gambling problem, and a working girl
who supports her entire family. These people
are all deviating from the norm of Cold
War conservative values in some way; they
are either morally corrupt, they have failed
to arrange themselves into proper nuclear
units. As a result, the economic prosperity
of the Fifties has eluded them, and they
are desperate enough to do bizarre and exotic
things to pay off their exorbitant debts.
When Loren promises to award them $10,000
if they survive a night in his home all
readily surrender their dignity and sell
themselves to this odd John. Thus Haunted
Hill is a sort of cautionary parable
about errant living.
Here again, Jordan exposes his laziness.
The visitors in his movie are not a cross-section
of any facet of American culture. They’re
simply stock types: nervous priest-in-training
(Peter Gallager), a wild, available young
babe (Jennifer Tilly), an uppity Duke University
parapsychologist (Martin Ferrero), a movie
mogul’s rich-bitch daughter (Beverly D’Angelo)
and her worthless husband (Steve Guttenberg).
These people are not united by dark commonalities,
they’re just taking a random vacation to
rural Ireland.
|
 |
|
In High Spirits, Plunkett has all
the financial woes, while his guests are
well-off. After a Malibu millionaire threatens
to foreclose on his monstrous home, Plunkett
hatches a wacky scheme to transform the
castle into a theme park of counterfeit
ghosts to lure wealthy American tourists.
Things get loused-up from the get-go when
the Americans arrive and a kooky adventure
ensues. (A knight on roller skates?? Now
I’ve seen everything!) The hotel
staff makes a royal mess as their haunting
hi-jinks go haywire, while the self-absorbed,
thankless Americans are totally oblivious.
Little do they know, the castle really is
haunted by Plunkett’s ancestors, and suddenly
High Spirits morphs from a family
film to a sex comedy interspersed with earnest
romance. Who knew cold stiffs could be so
hot and bothered—not to mention emotionally
available? The adamantly whimsical score,
seemingly lifted from E.T. or Indiana
Jones, is startlingly inapt, and it
underscores the confusion and banality of
this indolent movie.
My wrath toward Jordan is indistinguishable
from my repulsion for Steve Guttenberg,
the pouting, emasculated Jack, whose defining
characteristics are his oversized sweater-vests
and his defenselessness against his frigid,
Valium-popping wife. (Her defining attribute
is that she mentions the drug by its brand-name
every few seconds, in case you didn’t get
it the last time, almost as if she’s doing
pharmaceutical product placement.) Poor
Jack’s wife finds him revolting, so he finds
himself a dead gal. The veteran of the Three
Men and a Baby franchise never imbues
Jack with anything resembling complexity,
even as his gee-shucks enthusiasm for the
simple things in life—guessing games, tall
tales, and true love—is juxtaposed with
his necrophilia.
A gargling, cooing man-baby, Guttenberg
appears to have taken acting lessons from
the Muppets. Instead of walking and talking,
he croaks and moseys. Jack is less funny
and more self-pitying than Fozzy Bear, and
deserves to be pummeled with poisoned tomatoes.
He’s not the first Muppet impersonator in
a movie about wacky specters run amok—Rick
Moranis did a fine job in Ghostbusters—but
he’s the first to sexually violate the dead.
Speaking of Ghostbusters, Guttenberg
is a near dead ringer for Mr. Stay Puft,
only scarier and more bloated.
In sum, while I understand that retrospectives
exist to celebrate and contexutalize a director’s
life work rather than dismiss it, the truth
is that High Spirits may be the worst
thing I’ve ever seen. I suppose the spooks
on screen were high, but this dreadful movie
rendered my own spirit utterly desiccated.
|
|