Linklater
Symposium
Introduction
Richard
Linklater Interview
-Before
Sunset
1. Old Haunts
2. Mortal Beloved
3. A Confused Love Letter
4. Things to Come
-Slacker
-School of Rock
-Waking Life
-Dazed and Confused
1. That Old Feeling
2. Rock and Roll All Night
-SubUrbia
-It's Impossible to Learn to
Plow by Reading Books
-Live From Shiva's
Dance Floor
-The Newton Boys
-Before Sunrise
-Tape
Exclusive Features
Christopher Doyle Interview
-Hero
Thom Andersen Interview
-Los Angeles Plays Itself
New Releases
-Godzilla
-Maria Full of Grace
-Josh Marston correspondence
-The Terminal
-Super Size Me
-Coffee and Cigarettes
-Son Frère
-The Day After Tomorrow
-Zatoichi
-The Stepford Wives
-Spiderman 2
-Troy
DVD
-Floating
Weeds
about us
links
issue archive
contact us
mailing list
advertising
|
 |
 |
    |
|
That
Old Feeling
Elbert Ventura on Dazed and Confused
In my callow teenage
years, Dazed and Confused resided in that rarefied
pantheon of movies prized less for their artistic merits
than for what they said about me and my friends. For
our fanboy coterie, movies like Reservoir Dogs,
Goodfellas, Miller’s Crossing, and Clerks,
among a select few, were nothing less than formative
influences on inchoate sensibilities. They were repositories
of cool, and nothing more: an inexhaustible supply of
lines, gestures, and shots that we threw out at one
another as badges of our impeccable taste and budding
sophistication. Our ardor was unadulterated and unexamined,
and it fueled the presumption that these movies belonged
to us alone.
Dazed and Confused seemed particularly fruitful
quarry for our indulgence. By the time it came out on
video, where it would gain its sizable cult, we were
in our senior year of high school, a period that can
best be described as a prolonged wallow in proleptic
nostalgia. Richard Linklater’s reverie of the last day
of school in 1976 was specific in time and place, but
it seemed custom-made for us anyway. So much so that,
even then, the movie seemed destined to be diminished
by its context. Could anything that captured the twilight
of high school this lovingly have any resonance beyond
our teenage years?
The primary pleasure, then, of reacquainting myself
with Linklater’s movie is to discover how utterly unwarranted
my condescension has been. Hardly eager to revisit it—the
memory of the fiim the sweeter for remaining unseen—viewing
Dazed and Confused ten years later affirms my
fervor at 17. For a movie that I had damned with the
faint praise of being merely “cool” has become something
else: a great film.
The curious thing is that nothing about the movie has
changed. To paraphrase Matthew McConaughey’s Wooderson,
I may have grown older, but it has stayed the same age.
It’s a measure of Dazed and Confused’s unpretentious
greatness that my deepened appreciation pivots on one
of its lessons: that the earliest versions of ourselves
are just as valid as the people we are now. Casting
a loving eye on our teenage years, Linklater rejects
the Olympian vantage our grown-up selves frequently
retreat to. Withholding judgment on his characters and
their actions, he memorializes our naiveté with fondness,
and in the process, revitalizes our idealism, which,
we are reminded, need not strictly be associated with
youth.
|
 |
|
As with much of his
oeuvre, Dazed and Confused evinces Linklater’s
aversion to conventional structure. Time takes primacy
over plot and exerts tyranny over agency: think of the
shapeless ramblings of Slacker and Waking
Life, or of the melancholy seepage of minutes in
Before Sunrise and Sunset. In Dazed
and Confused, Linklater eschews a traditional narrative
for a gallery of vignettes, all taking place in one
memorable day. His parting gift to his characters is
that final shot of open road: the movie may end, but
time stretches infinitely into the distance for them.
A decade is a long time for ambivalence to take hold.
Dazed and Confused bridged the distance from
the get-go, those first strains of Aerosmith’s “Sweet
Emotion” sending the first pang of nostalgia—a peculiar
effect for a song recorded before I was born. Just as
strange was the sight of the brilliant ensemble of unknowns,
as young as I was back in 1994. Who would’ve thought
that the guy playing the bully O’Bannion would one day
be known as Ben Affleck? More poignant are the actors
seemingly frozen in the movie’s amber: Michelle Burke,
Jason London, Rory Cochrane, Sasha Jenson, Cole Hauser,
etc. So good here and invisible since, their disappointing
career trajectories lace the movie’s celebration of
glorious youth with an added touch of wistfulness.
That I responded as strongly as I did to Dazed and
Confused a decade later is testament to the movie’s
profound understanding of the maturing process. Indeed,
the transformation of youthful ardor over time is a
central question in Linklater’s cinema. Does it deepen
or diminish? Perhaps Linklater’s greatest accomplishment
in Dazed and Confused is to encourage us to revisit
our youth with nothing but wonder and appreciation.
In his generous acceptance of the persons that we were,
Linklater offers us the key to growing into adulthood
gracefully. |
|
|