    |
|
It’s
the Little Things
Kristi Mitsuda on Broken Flowers
Jim Jarmusch’s
steadfast commitment to the swings of an eccentric
sensibility defines his output to such a degree
that I can as easily understand why someone would
hate his movies as love them, in the same way
you either mesh with certain personalities or
don’t. Something of an acquired taste, I happen
to feel an affinity for his random wanderers,
of whom his most recent, Bill Murray’s Don Johnston—the
similarity of name and predilections to the legendary
lothario mirthfully noted throughout—is perhaps
the most unconsciously forlorn.
Left by his most recent lover, Sherry (Julie Delpy),
in the first five minutes of Broken Flowers
with the utterance, “It’s like I’m your mistress,
only you’re not even married,” we recognize Don’s
type immediately: an aging bachelor, a bit of
an ass, stunted by inertia. As per the rule in
such cases, only an external force can push him
towards personal evolution, and it arrives in
the form of an anonymous pink envelope bearing
a type-written letter informing him he fathered
a son 19 years ago. He’s prodded by his friend,
Winston (played by the splendiferous Jeffrey Wright),
an aspiring sleuth so intrigued by the mystery
of the mother’s identity he takes it upon himself
to plan out Don’s entire trip down memory lane
to visit the ghosts of girlfriends past.
The journey’s progression will not reveal answers
but, in a manner specific to Jarmusch tales, lead
further towards ruminative ambiguity and widening
possibility, a space where despair commingles
easily with hope. His deceptively concrete, observational
style—the propensity for traveling shots intermixed
with views from a static camera intact—is leavened
by a characteristically elusive existential questioning.
But while other films in Jarmusch’s oeuvre have
remained floating in my consciousness for days
afterwards, none touched me quite so deeply as
Broken Flowers. This is a product of the
film’s configuration, of course—who hasn’t wondered
where a past love is now—which allows spectators
to bring their own baggage to the viewing, but
also speaks to the (dare I use such an easily
maligned word?) maturity of its director, who
finally allows for the expansion of underlying
emotional terrain often precluded—but this time
fostered—by a devout minimalism.
Situated firmly in the present with no recourse
to flourishes like flashbacks or extended reminiscences,
Don goes forth on his quest. Each knock on the
door to an old flame brings only the slightest
indication of former feeling. Since we’re given
scant information to go on—limited to what we
can infer through furnishings and the briefest
of encounters—seeing what shimmers beneath the
surface of Don’s interactions with his exes and
sifting through the layers of suggestiveness becomes
an absorbing activity more riveting than dramatic
disclosure. You begin to unearth (or invent?)
potential narratives for each woman, and it’s
as much a credit to the uniformly excellent actresses
portraying them as to the director how fertile
this field is for sowing.
We flesh things out through subtle hints: The
way Laura (Sharon Stone) curtly greets him until
recognition hits, and a slow smile spreads across
her face, fond memories dancing in her eyes; Don’s
surprised delight when presented with a black-and-white
photo featuring a flower-child Dora (Francis Conroy)—which
he took—framed in her contrastingly modern prefab
home; the guarded suspicion with which Carmen
(Jessica Lange) considers his visit, a clear disruption
in the mellowness of her new-age existence as
broadcast by her practice as an “animal communicator,
“ her loosely-wavy hair, and the floor cushion
she sits on; the succinct fury of Penny (Tilda
Swinton) cluing us in to long-ago betrayals; and
the tenderness with which Don simply states, “Hey,
beautiful,” and gently rests pink flowers on a
dead girlfriend’s grave. In these flickering exchanges,
a sadness—nostalgic or regretful—predominates
and imparts more information about the characters
than we expect.
Finding the answers to the swirling questions
isn’t the point. We reach the end knowing no more
about the “truth” than we did at the beginning.
But the work has been done nonetheless; a turning
point (visualized by the last shot) has been reached.
And, as Jarmusch is so keen on pointing out, the
journey is the destination. |