 |
 |
|
Once More in Oh-Four
Karen Wilson on Tanner ‘88
On the campaign trail for the Democratic
presidential nomination, two old political colleagues
run into each other at a small town photo opportunity.
Pausing in front of the cameras, one introduces the
other to his daughter and all three chat amiably, though
they represent different parties. The Democrat mugs
that he hopes it comes down in the end to a contest
between the two of them. Chuckling, the Republican shakes
his hand and wishes him well.
For anyone who lived through the 1996 election or who
has caught a few advertisements for Pepsi or Viagra,
the face of the Republican—former presidential nominee
Bob Dole—is a familiar one. However, the Democrat and
his daughter may be less recognizable. They’re actually
actors: Michael Murphy plays Jack Tanner, a congressman
from Michigan running for the Democrat presidential
nomination and Cynthia Nixon as his college-aged daughter,
Alex Tanner, who has left school to help her father’s
campaign. As the subjects of director Robert Altman
and cartoonist Garry Trudeau’s TV political satire Tanner
‘88, Murphy and Nixon, plus their staff and the
journalists following them on the nomination trail are
supposed to blend in with the crowd, looking perfectly
natural when at a fundraiser, leading an impromptu student
rally, or schmoozing the delegates on the floor of the
Atlanta Democrat Convention. Utilizing his signature
roaming camera style, Altman makes us believe we’re
watching the drama of Tanner’s run unfold before us
unawares. Nothing’s sacred in a campaign and thus every
salacious moment is perfectly caught by this anonymous
camera.
However, unlike most professional politicians who seem
as comfortable within their carefully crafted public
personas as inside an expensive suit, Murphy’s Tanner
has to undergo the transformation from idealistic professor/congressman
to jaded spin doctor finagling votes from delegates
before Altman’s intrusive camera. We get to see every
awkward grimace and flash of self-aware embarrassment
on Murphy’s face.
Tanner ‘88 runs for eleven episodes—an hour-long
pilot plus 10 half-hour installments from the New Hampshire
primary through the Atlanta national convention. Altman
intended for the show, made for HBO, to run through
the November election, but it was unfortunately canceled
before he could complete it. Thus, the closing moment
of episode eleven just after the nominating convention,
feels only like a pause, as though the previous vignettes
had been just snapshots within a larger picture. The
miniseries format and the unresolved nature of the “ending”
(will Tanner run as an Independent candidate after losing
the primary?), both serve very well Altman’s purpose
in constructing a complex satire grounded in “reality.”
It’s as though Tanner’s life could not be contained
in a two-hour feature film.
|
 |
|
Most political films
and television shows exist within a vacuum, a fantasy
world not reflecting those actually in office but the
ideal of what writers and directors wish could be our
national destiny. David Edelstein in his Aug 18, 2000
Slate article about political filmmaking, “Pols On Film,”
illustrates a cunning narrative trope common in campaign
drama that he calls “the Big Speech.” At the climactic
moment, our candidate throws aside his carefully crafted
words to give his audience, and us, the real deal. It’s
meant to be a humanizing and hero-making gesture that
tugs at our heartstrings. In Tanner ‘88Altman
blatantly eschews this kind of sentiment-grubbing in
favor of something more complex. With every episode,
as Tanner and his crew confront logistical disasters
(a broken-down bus filled with reporters), media bumbling
(a helicopter swoops in on the congressman’s wedding),
or situations fraught with moral grey areas (the discovery
by a reporter of the candidate’s relationship with a
fellow campaign’s manager), there do not seem to be
any easy answers. This is much more satisfying than
any triumphant Mr. Smith Goes to Washington-style
filibuster. As the moderator for the presidential debate,
Linda Ellerbee (another politico playing herself), points
out, anyone who goes through the whole process and gets
to the White House probably isn’t someone you want there.
Yet Tanner argues, in a direct address to the camera
filmed for the Sundance Channel re-release, that this
system is the best we’ve got. Altman and Trudeau’s main
purpose could be to explicate this conundrum.
Recalling my own memories of the ‘88 election, I so
remember wanting the process to be reducible to a fight
between the good guys and the bad. In our elementary-school
mock election, situated as it was in a moderately affluent
suburb of San Francisco, it was unsurprisingly a decision
for Dukakis by a landslide. In my own house, the Dems
were the good guys and Ronald Reagan was “a turkey,”
so of course that’s how the whole country must feel,
right? Or at least, that was my eleven-year-old reasoning.
I remember vividly how shocked I was by the muckraking
and badgering about Dukakis’s personal life, in particular
the exposure of his wife Kitty’s drinking addiction.
For years, I would eye the opaque plastic bottle of
rubbing alcohol in our medicine cabinet with wariness
and think of our would-be First Lady.
It is intriguing to watch Tanner ‘88 16 years
later and to be so aware of these hindsight-is-20/20
details about the actual candidates, and particularly
to know how it all turned out. Watching Kitty onscreen
as herself, in her faux regal posturing, chatting with
the actress who plays Tanner’s love interest, is a little
cringe-worthy. Yet, it’s still easy even now to be caught
up in the characters’ tide of idealism and hope for
that year’s election. Like our own current race, there’s
a tendency to make it into a Manichean case of good
versus evil—a regime that must be removed by a moral
(read: liberal) imperative. Yet Tanner ‘88 also
struggles hard against that tendency. Tanner characterizes
himself to the media surrounding him as an aging hippie
intellectual whose stance on drugs (legalize them) is
based on his own experiences as a spouse of a drug addict.
He also is quick to broadcast his involvement in the
Civil Rights movement, acting shocked when the flacks
around him don’t get his references to Selma. In one
of the early episodes, at a campaign stop in Alabama,
Tanner visits a prominent black preacher, an old friend
from the Sixties with whom he has fallen out of touch.
He is hurt and shocked that his media director uses
this connection as an impromptu press conference, gathering
the entire media corps on site without Tanner’s knowledge.
Tanner can’t believe his staffer would so blatantly
step outside the mode of privacy, and for the next few
episodes, Tanner freezes the staffer out of the major
decisions.
|
    |
|
Yet in contrast to these
instances of moral uprightness is Tanner’s growing sheepishness
over his daughter Alex’s youthful brashness. The series
depicts the father and teenaged daughter as surprisingly
close, but Alex’s conception of her father’s stance
on certain issues seems to fall further left than Tanner
would like to appear. In one sequence, Alex talks her
dad into attending an anti-Apartheid rally just before
he’s set to present at a Congressional hearing. In the
flurry of the moment, under Alex’s pressure and in front
of a bunch of reporters, Tanner not only attends the
rally but also ends up handcuffed to a line of other
protestors and then carted off to jail. While Tanner
certainly doesn’t come across as in support of the racist
South African government in his obvious reticence to
act decisively, he seems supremely embarrassed to have
been caught on camera in such a display. Alex seems
to think that all one needs to do to be elected is to
speak from one’s convictions, but Jack Tanner appears
to know differently. Partially that wisdom must come
from age, but I think it’s safe to assume that Tanner
also accepts the inevitable tidying up of principles
for manageable sound bites. In a Jimmy Stewart for President
America, we wouldn’t see such compromises, but here
in Altman and Trudeau’s universe, it’s at the forefront.
After watching Tanner ‘88 again, what stands
out most prominently in the depiction of Jack Tanner
is how important it is to have elected officials who
question themselves and our system. Tanner is an intellectual,
engaged in the world around him, ideal when he feels
he needs to be but pragmatic when the situation arises.
Let’s just hope, as we come upon this November’s election,
that kind of leader isn’t too much of an unfulfillable
American fantasy as we so often see onscreen.
The original television miniseries of Tanner ‘88
will be repeated on the Sundance Channel Tuesday nights
at 8 pm, Eastern and Pacific times, beginning Aug. 31
and continuing through Oct. 5; new episodes, titled
“Tanner on Tanner,” begin on Oct. 5 at 9 pm, Eastern
and Pacific times, and continue Tuesday nights at 9
pm. Check local listings for Central time. The Criterion
Collection will also soon be releasing the series on
DVD with video conversation between Altman and Trudeau,
as well as additional essays by film critic Michael
Wilmington, video critic/curator Michael Nash, and culture
critic Garry Kornblau. |
|